Bruce Lee explains why many open data and technology-led initiatives go wrong.
(See minute 1.14).
October 20, 2013 by Linda Raftree
Bruce Lee explains why many open data and technology-led initiatives go wrong.
(See minute 1.14).
Posted in accountability, development, governance, ICT4D, ICTs, mobile and technology, open data, open development, open government, participation, politics, random, musing or confusing, wait... what? | Tagged bruce lee, emotional content, finger pointing at the moon, ICT4D, open data, open development | 1 Comment
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Innovation and ethics in evaluation on the European Evaluation Society (EES) EvalEdge podcast (July 2020)
A chat about the Responsible Data Maturity Model with Amos Doornbos (June 2020)
Is informed consent possible in humanitarian cash and voucher assistance? with the Cash Learning Partnership (December 2019).
Digital Ethics on the International Rescue Committee’s Tomorrow’s World podcast (November 2019).
Considering ICT4D with Linda Raftree on Aidpreneur (May 2015).
Linda Raftree, LLC: I work as an independent consultant on digital development research, strategy and evaluation with an emphasis on responsible data use, inclusion, gender, and children and young people. I support organizations to develop, implement, and engage staff and partners in responsible data policy and practice. I enjoy facilitating and moderating convenings, workshops and learning-focused events.
MERL Tech: conference, blog, and discussion forum that facilitate discussion and learning about the role of digital data and new technology in monitoring, evaluation, research and learning (co-founder and lead organizer)
Technology Salon: convening and facilitating discussion on the role of ICTs in international development. (co-founder and NYC convener)
White Save Me: the app that helps white men deliver privilege with a simple tap of the finger. (co-creator)
2023
2022
Responsible Data Governance for M&E in the African Context. Part 1: Overview of Data Governance
Responsible Data Governance for M&E in the African Context. Part 2: Practical Guidance
2021
Getting remote M&E right: Ethics, challenges and gaps
The Case for Better Governance of Children’s Data: A Manifesto
Data Responsibility Toolkit: A Guide for Cash and Voucher Practitioners
Case Study: Data Responsibility and Digital Remote Targeting during COVID-19
Case Study: Responsible Data Sharing with Governments
2020
Digital Safeguarding for Migrating and Displaced Children
COVID-19: A spotlight on child data governance gaps
MERL Tech State of the Field: The Evolution of MERL Tech
What We Know About Traditional MERL Tech: Insights from a Scoping Review
Big Data to Data Science: Moving from “What” to “How” in the MERL Tech Space
2019
Responsible Data Maturity Model
Exploring the soft side: Ethics, inclusion, bias, and privacy in ICT-enabled evaluation
Digital and Social Media for Social and Behavior Change Communications (literature review)
Head to Head: Biometrics and Aid (Article in the New Humanitarian)
Considerations for Using Data Responsibly at USAID
Responsible Data Practices: Literature Review for USAID (available on request)
2018
Digital Safeguarding Tips and Guidance
2017
The Nexus of Microwork and Impact Sourcing: Implications for Youth Employment
2016
SIMLab’s Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Girls Digital Privacy, Safety and Security Principles and Guidelines
2014
Emerging Opportunities: Monitoring and Evaluation in a Tech-Enabled World
2013
Mobiles for Youth Workforce Development
Modern Mobility: The role of ICTs in child and youth migration
So very true! STOP staring at the finger!