-
-
This morning I participated in a massive conference call about photography in aid and development, and the ethics and values that surround photos taken and used by NGOs. The call was organized by CORE Group (@coregroupdc). Now maybe I’m exaggerating here, but the call organizer, Ann Hendrix-Jenkins, read off a list of participants that went on forever. I’m estimating that there were something like 40 or 50 people listening in from as many organizations. This topic has always been important for a strong segment of NGO staff and it seems to be gaining steam again.After I started tweeting about it, a couple of people asked if I’d be writing a blog post. So here it is. I’ve ‘Storified’ it since I was tweeting instead of taking notes, and because there was a nice side conversation happening with folks on Twitter too. (See the Storify here – it looks a little bit nicer there than it does here.)
-
-
The call organizers had earlier conducted a survey about NGO images, policies, consent, and operational processes around photographers and photography and shared it with participants ahead of the call. The organizers also suggested a couple of links to check out beforehand, including an Aid Watch post (“Adorable child in NGO fund-raising photo sues for royalties“) and a link to a photo that appeared in the New York Times. These two links and other similar “poverty porn images” had sparked the discussions that led to the decision to organize today’s call. [update: here is the original discussion thread on Linked In]
-
“Jeez – like 50 orgs on this CORE call re: photography, ethics and values. Discussing: @aidwatch post ht.ly/a3gYA & more
-
-
“Second photo touching off this conversation is NYT image from last year re Somalia famine. ht.ly/a3i0s #povertyporn
-
-
-
-
-
Laura Pohl (@lauraepohl) from Bread for the World gave a short introduction to the topic along with some points to think about.
-
- After this introduction, Jim Stipe from Catholic Relief Services gave a quick summary of the survey highlights, and we had a group discussion around some of the key issues detected in the survey and additional ones sourced from the participants on the call.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
“@meowtree I’ve always found Photovoice UK’s ethical guidelines useful in regard to some the issues at your discussion photovoice.org/images/uplo…
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Issues around consent, alternative ways to obtain consent, release forms, and how to get truly informed consent.
- Ethics of both taking photos and ethics of using photos – these are related yet separate issues.
- What makes for a good NGO photo? What’s a good vs bad photo? What works and what doesn’t?
- How do you grow your options for getting more high quality photos? How to train your staff on good photography? How to find and work with good freelance photographers? How to plan out a shoot and put the right amount of time into it? How to ensure photos are taken ethically?
- Creating a photo policy, what does a good photo policy look like? what should it contain?
- How to tell better stories? You can document your programs with photos and you can tell visual stories – these are 2 different things….
- Getting good photo captions. If you don’t have good captions, photos are less useful.
- Other places to source photos; eg., if you don’t have the photos you need, where can you go to get them?
- Photo journalism vs NGO photography – similar yet different, different approaches and goals. Let’s discuss this.
- Vocabulary for talking about photos in order to articulate to staff why one photo better than another. Turning gut sense into language and tools.
- Looking at studies on the use of photos and their impact on donors, what can we learn from that? How to reconcile the different set of ethics that we may find in terms of ‘what works’ for fundraising and what is ethical?
- What about participatory media and people portraying themselves and their own images
- An Ombudsperson within INGOs who can defend the rights of those being photographed
- The question of how people perceive you when you go from doing program work to becoming a photographer in the same afternoon.
- The related question about what happens when your organization makes you do both things? Who owns the photos? Do you get paid if your organization uses them? What if you are using your own equipment? How is your organization using you if that’s not your job in the first place? What are you expected to do and how much of this should you actually be doing?
- Budgeting. We need to begin inserting budget into the conversation. How much can we pay photographers, or do we invest in training our own staff?
-
-
-
-
-
-
I’m looking forward to continuing the discussions as this is an issue that constantly jumps out at me. It’s fantastic to know that there is such a strong contingent of NGO staff who are keen to address the issues around how we take and how we use photographs of the people that we work with.
-